On December 3, 2024, a significant legal development occurred in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland. Judge Amos L. Mazzant of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) (31 U.S.C. § 5336) and its reporting rules under 31 C.F.R. 1010.380. This ruling has substantial implications for businesses across the United States.

The Court's Ruling

Judge Mazzant's decision primarily hinges on the argument that the CTA represents an unconstitutional overreach by Congress. The court found that the CTA and its reporting requirements likely violate constitutional protections, leading to the issuance of a nationwide preliminary injunction.

This injunction halts the enforcement of the CTA and suspends the upcoming compliance deadlines.

Practical Implications for Businesses

The immediate effect of this ruling is the suspension of the December 31, 2024, deadline for beneficial ownership reporting by companies in existence as of December 31, 2023. Additionally, newly organized reporting companies are not required to report beneficial ownership information under the deadlines previously applicable to them.

This decision provides a temporary reprieve for businesses that were preparing to comply with the CTA's stringent reporting requirements. However, it is essential for businesses to stay informed about ongoing legal developments, as the situation may change rapidly.

Ongoing Legal Battles

The constitutionality of the CTA is also under review in the Eleventh Circuit in the case of NSBU v. Yellen, No. 24-10736. While the district court in that case also found the CTA to be unconstitutional, its order enjoining enforcement was limited to the particular plaintiffs involved.

In contrast, the injunction in the Texas Top Cop Shop case applies nationwide, affecting all reporting companies across the country.

Compliance Considerations

Despite the nationwide scope of the injunction, there may be some uncertainty regarding its enforceability outside the Eastern District of Texas. Conservative practitioners may advise their clients to continue with CTA compliance to avoid potential legal risks, especially if the injunction is overturned or modified in the future.

Conclusion

The preliminary injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act represents a significant legal development with broad implications for businesses nationwide. While the ruling temporarily halts compliance obligations, the final outcome of this case remains uncertain. Businesses should remain vigilant and prepared to comply with the CTA's requirements if the injunction is lifted.

CONTACT THE D'ORLANDO FIRM, PLLC TODAY

Have questions?  The D'Orlando Firm, PLLC can help. Contact us today online or at (267) 392-5428 to schedule a free consultation.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Always consult with a licensed attorney for legal advice.